By Kelly Beatty

March 15: Any parent of teenagers will tell you that it's often a challenge to keep enough food in the house. It's amazing how often — and how much — they can eat.

The same could be said for the appetite of our home galaxy.

Today the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) are the massive "anchors" in the Local Group of galaxies, about 30 denizens in all. Most of these are dwarf galaxies, diminutive systems such as the Magellanic Clouds with several billion stars (compared to our galaxy's 200 to 400 billion). But in the past there must have been far more dwarfs, and astronomers have assumed for some time that the Milky Way was a ravenous teenager, having devoured many if not most of the dwarfs in its immediate vicinity.

Like crime-scene investigators, observers have been looking for evidence of the Milky's Way's fits of cannibalism in the halo of matter that surrounds its main spiral; that's where the stars, gas, dark matter, and globular clusters from the consumed victims end up. Two recent publications demonstrate that cosmic detectives have chased down some promising leads

First comes word, from Duncan Forbes and Terry Bridges of Australia's Swinburne University, that up to one quarter of the Milky Way's globular clusters formed elsewhere and migrated into its halo. The observers used the Hubble Space Telescope to assess the age and composition of dozens of globulars lying within about 65,000 light-years of our galaxy's centre, then pooled their data with other observations.

The upshot, described in a paper submitted to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, is that roughly 25% of the Milky Way's globulars came from 6 to 8 dwarf galaxies accreted by the Milky Way over time. As Forbes notes in a Society press release, "Our work shows that there are more of these accreted dwarf galaxies in our Milky Way than was thought."

More evidence of the Milky Way's unsated appetite comes from Anna Frebel (Centre for Astrophysics), Evan Kirby (Caltech), and Joshua Simon (Carnegie Observatories). In the March 4th issue of Nature, they make the case that a star in the Sculptor dwarf galaxy is chemically similar to the Milky Way's oldest stars and thus might be among the earliest stars to form after the Big Bang.

Frebel's team identified an 18th-magnitude star in the Sculptor that contains almost no "metal" — a term astrophysicists apply to any elements other than hydrogen or helium. In fact, this star has only 1/6000 the heavy-element content of the Sun.

Here's why that matters: Stars cook up heavy elements through fusion and supernovae, and every subsequent generation of stars incorporates the elemental ashes left by its predecessors. If a star lacks these "metals," it must have formed too long ago to have swept up the recycled carbon, iron, and other elements found in younger stars.

By this measure, lots of stars in the Milky Way are quite old — but such ancient suns had never been found in the feedstock of dwarfs that surround it. "If dwarf galaxies were the original components of the Milky Way," explains Simon in a press release, "then it's hard to understand why they wouldn't have similar stars." Now that one's been found, he adds, the idea that the Milky Way's halo represents the corpses of many dwarf galaxies "does indeed appear to be correct."